ETD-L Archives – November 2009

1. ETD Platform and policy survey
   • ETD Platform and policy survey (166 lines)
     From: Brown, Matthew <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:27:29 -0500

2. ETD Tutorial Videos
   • Re: ETD Tutorial Videos (72 lines)
     From: Martin Courtois <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:11:03 -0800

3. FW: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ
   • FW: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (115 lines)
     From: Sampson, Elizabeth <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:00:32 -0600

4. FW: Video in PDF Draft Script
   • FW: Video in PDF Draft Script (57 lines)
     From: Tyndall, John L. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:07:29 -0500
   • Re: FW: Video in PDF Draft Script (71 lines)
     From: Thomas Dowling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:33:21 -0500
   • Re: FW: Video in PDF Draft Script (18449 lines)
     From: Tyndall, John L. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:40:04 -0500
   • Re: FW: Video in PDF Draft Script (122 lines)
     From: Dickens, Ginger L <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:58:35 -0600
   • Re: FW: Video in PDF Draft Script (46 lines)
     From: Thomas Dowling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:28:00 -0500
   • Re: FW: Video in PDF Draft Script (259 lines)
     From: John Hagen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:32:41 -0500

5. NDLTD Celebration of Open Access Week 2009 - YouTube Contest Winners
   • NDLTD Celebration of Open Access Week 2009 - YouTube Contest Winners (8058 lines)
     From: John Hagen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:45:36 -0500

6. Permissions
   • Permissions (36 lines)
     From: Michael Boock <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:15:12 -0800
   • Re: Permissions (67 lines)
     From: Rhonda Marker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:05:46 -0500
   • Re: Permissions (66 lines)
     From: Dickens, Ginger L <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:56:26 -0600
   • Re: Permissions (40 lines)
     From: Thomas Dowling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:21:56 -0500
   • Re: Permissions (172 lines)
     From: John Hagen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:32:26 -0500

7. Retrospective digitization of Theses and Dissertations
   • Retrospective digitization of Theses and Dissertations (28 lines)
     From: Gail Clement <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:43:32 -0600

8. Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ
   • Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (35 lines)
     From: Gail Clement <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:59:54 -0600
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (200 lines)
     From: John Hagen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:34:43 -0500
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (158 lines)
     From: Max Read <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:39:39 -0800
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (20 lines)
     From: Thomas Dowling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:05:27 -0500
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (41 lines)
     From: Thomas Dowling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:16:42 -0500
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (63 lines)
     From: Gail McMillan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:23:02 -0500
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (60 lines)
     From: Gail Clement <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:35:22 -0600
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (76 lines)
     From: Deeken, Joanne <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:26:37 -0500
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (302 lines)
     From: Marie M Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:46:39 -0600
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (109 lines)
     From: Chris Awre <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:03:25 +0000
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (145 lines)
     From: Nancy Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:28:15 -0800
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (109 lines)
     From: Marisa Ramirez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:53:58 -0800
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (160 lines)
     From: Gail Clement <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:15:18 -0600
   • Re: Stanford opts out of mandatory submission to PQ (89 lines)
     From: Guy Teasdale <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:07:33 -0500

9. Video in PDF Draft Script
   • Re: Video in PDF Draft Script (240 lines)
     From: Timothy Plumer Jr. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:49:28 -0800
   • Re: Video in PDF Draft Script (183 lines)
     From: Mark Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:34:09 -0800
   • Re: Video in PDF Draft Script (202 lines)
     From: Leonard Rosenthol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:38:55 -0800