TECHSUPPORT Archives – February 2005

1. A Simple Guide to Securing USB Memory Sticks
   • A Simple Guide to Securing USB Memory Sticks (16 lines)
     From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:49:10 -0500

2. ABBOTT AND COSTELLO'S COMPUTER CONVERSATION (fwd)
   • ABBOTT AND COSTELLO'S COMPUTER CONVERSATION (fwd) (188 lines)
     From: Randy Marchany <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:29:57 -0500

3. ad-aware
   • ad-aware (26 lines)
     From: Jamie Evans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:21:34 -0500
   • Re: ad-aware (37 lines)
     From: Kroll, Greg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:35:00 -0500
   • Re: ad-aware (54 lines)
     From: Jamie Evans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:38:52 -0500
   • Re: ad-aware (43 lines)
     From: Kevin Rooney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:36:58 -0500
   • Re: ad-aware (63 lines)
     From: Jamie Evans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:24:40 -0500

4. Alternative to Goliath on the Mac
   • Alternative to Goliath on the Mac (17 lines)
     From: Samuel Davies <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:13:51 -0500
   • Re: Alternative to Goliath on the Mac (37 lines)
     From: Anthony Atkins <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:21:47 -0500

5. anti-spam opinions?
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (35 lines)
     From: Sedlak, Neil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:24:15 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (47 lines)
     From: Ron Jarrell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:25:40 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (22 lines)
     From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:41:13 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (23 lines)
     From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:40:44 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (23 lines)
     From: Franchi, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:44:27 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (29 lines)
     From: Sedlak, Neil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:24:00 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (37 lines)
     From: Valdis Kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:39:13 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (17 lines)
     From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:41:27 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (27 lines)
     From: Richard Godbee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:27:26 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (40 lines)
     From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:45:20 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (36 lines)
     From: Sedlak, Neil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:31:14 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (24 lines)
     From: Ron Jarrell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:46:47 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (16 lines)
     From: Ron Jarrell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:51:33 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (23 lines)
     From: Ron Jarrell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:50:27 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (42 lines)
     From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:08:56 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (59 lines)
     From: Phil Benchoff <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 19:20:24 -0500
   • Re: anti-spam opinions? (32 lines)
     From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:55:17 -0500

6. Anybody got a suggestion
   • Anybody got a suggestion (24 lines)
     From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:26:29 -0500
   • Re: Anybody got a suggestion (35 lines)
     From: Brian Maloney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:43:22 -0500
   • Re: Anybody got a suggestion (25 lines)
     From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:56:03 -0500

7. Anybody running Arkeia for backups?
   • Anybody running Arkeia for backups? (19 lines)
     From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:07:59 -0500
   • Re: Anybody running Arkeia for backups? (19 lines)
     From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:25:02 -0500

8. Anybody using Trend?
   • Anybody using Trend? (19 lines)
     From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:34:41 -0500

9. Anyone know why I'm gettin this on VT WebOutlook?
   • Re: Anyone know why I'm gettin this on VT WebOutlook? (68 lines)
     From: Mike Moyer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:16:32 -0500

10. Ask your users if they've been insulted by their PC lately...
    • Ask your users if they've been insulted by their PC lately... (16 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:50:20 -0500

11. Banner and vtfbanner databases available
    • Re: Banner and vtfbanner databases available (59 lines)
      From: Carpenter, Shane <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 08:41:13 -0500

12. Banner and vtfbanner databases unavailable Sunday, February 6th
    • Banner and vtfbanner databases unavailable Sunday, February 6th (42 lines)
      From: DBMS-IWA Calendar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:00:06 -0500

13. Be sure that any Symantec Anti-Virus products are up to date especially on older systems
    • Be sure that any Symantec Anti-Virus products are up to date especially on older systems (15 lines)
      From: Fischer, Eric <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:47:18 -0500
    • Re: Be sure that any Symantec Anti-Virus products are up to date especially on older systems (24 lines)
      From: Steve Warrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:36 -0500
    • Re: Be sure that any Symantec Anti-Virus products are up to date especially on older systems (43 lines)
      From: Fischer, Eric <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:31:33 -0500
    • Re: Be sure that any Symantec Anti-Virus products are up to date especially on older systems (133 lines)
      From: Steve Warrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:15:22 -0500
    • Re: Be sure that any Symantec Anti-Virus products are up to date especially on older systems (97 lines)
      From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:17:42 -0500
    • Re: Be sure that any Symantec Anti-Virus products are up to date especially on older systems (43 lines)
      From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:25:28 -0500

14. Beware the new generation of Windows rootkits
    • Beware the new generation of Windows rootkits (16 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:25:32 -0500

15. Bi-Directional Transactional Replication!
    • Bi-Directional Transactional Replication! (257 lines)
      From: Jim Rathmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:42:43 -0500
    • Re: Bi-Directional Transactional Replication! (296 lines)
      From: Farmer, Scott <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:22:27 -0500

16. Blacklists
    • Blacklists (22 lines)
      From: Bruce Harper <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:07:58 -0500
    • Re: Blacklists (41 lines)
      From: Worrell, John <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:07:41 -0500
    • Re: Blacklists (38 lines)
      From: Sprague, Robert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:32:38 -0500

17. British government IT security for everyone site launched
    • British government IT security for everyone site launched (17 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:58:31 -0500

18. Buyer beware, Dell parts have several prices
    • Buyer beware, Dell parts have several prices (16 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:39:18 -0500

19. Calling IRIX Gurus: eoe.sw.base
    • Calling IRIX Gurus: eoe.sw.base (34 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:33:48 -0500
    • Re: Calling IRIX Gurus: eoe.sw.base (38 lines)
      From: Valdis Kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:54:27 -0500
    • Re: Calling IRIX Gurus: eoe.sw.base (36 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:10:38 -0500
    • Re: Calling IRIX Gurus: eoe.sw.base (53 lines)
      From: Valdis Kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:07:17 -0500

20. case on win system files
    • case on win system files (30 lines)
      From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:42:41 -0500

21. Client-Server Banner no longer available beginning March 1st 2005
    • Client-Server Banner no longer available beginning March 1st 2005 (21 lines)
      From: Smith, Jay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:10:59 -0500

22. Converting a user from a local Windows account to an AD account?
    • Converting a user from a local Windows account to an AD account? (16 lines)
      From: Joe Schottman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:25:48 -0500
    • Re: Converting a user from a local Windows account to an AD account? (38 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:37:32 -0500
    • Re: Converting a user from a local Windows account to an AD account? (40 lines)
      From: Tucker, Tom <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:14:52 -0500
    • Re: Converting a user from a local Windows account to an AD account? (51 lines)
      From: Fischer, Eric <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:18:50 -0500
    • Re: Converting a user from a local Windows account to an AD account? (33 lines)
      From: Davis, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:21:07 -0500

23. damaged LCD screen
    • damaged LCD screen (24 lines)
      From: mpfountz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:18:31 -0500
    • Re: damaged LCD screen (39 lines)
      From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:47:44 -0500

24. Dell Next Business day warranty
    • Dell Next Business day warranty (18 lines)
      From: Mark Lemon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:49:28 -0500
    • Re: Dell Next Business day warranty (35 lines)
      From: Steve Warrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:22:49 -0500

25. Detecting malicious use of NTFS alternate streams
    • Detecting malicious use of NTFS alternate streams (16 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:28:38 -0500

26. Does anyone have a working machine with a 5 1/4 in drive?
    • Does anyone have a working machine with a 5 1/4 in drive? (25 lines)
      From: carolyn kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:35:04 -0500

27. E-mail problems sending to juno.com?
    • E-mail problems sending to juno.com? (17 lines)
      From: Harry M. Kriz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:28:02 -0500

28. Entourage Question
    • Entourage Question (33 lines)
      From: Whitehurst, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:29:30 -0500
    • Re: Entourage Question (49 lines)
      From: Worrell, John <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:34:26 -0500
    • Re: Entourage Question (67 lines)
      From: Whitehurst, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:38:08 -0500
    • Re: Entourage Question (80 lines)
      From: Sprague, Rob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:42:58 -0500

29. Entourage Test Please Delete
    • Entourage Test Please Delete (14 lines)
      From: Tod Whitehurst <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:57:06 -0500

30. Eudora v6.2.0 critical security issue
    • Eudora v6.2.0 critical security issue (16 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:00:34 -0500
    • Re: Eudora v6.2.0 critical security issue (32 lines)
      From: James R. Dunson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:54:36 -0500
    • Re: Eudora v6.2.0 critical security issue (36 lines)
      From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:31:46 -0500

31. Exchange for macs on Citrix
    • Exchange for macs on Citrix (29 lines)
      From: Whitehurst, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:16:30 -0500
    • Re: Exchange for macs on Citrix (42 lines)
      From: Mike Moyer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:23:59 -0500
    • Re: Exchange for macs on Citrix (85 lines)
      From: Whitehurst, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:40:26 -0500
    • Re: Exchange for macs on Citrix (116 lines)
      From: Coles, Andrea <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:13:23 -0500

32. Filtering Mail in Outlook
    • Filtering Mail in Outlook (124 lines)
      From: Brill, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:14:12 -0500

33. Firefox 1.0.1 is out
    • Firefox 1.0.1 is out (21 lines)
      From: jschottm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:12:21 -0500

34. Free video editing software?
    • Free video editing software? (22 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:23:53 -0500
    • Re: Free video editing software? (27 lines)
      From: Brian Maloney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:16:33 -0500
    • Re: Free video editing software? (35 lines)
      From: Fleeman, Ronnie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:38:05 -0500
    • Re: Free video editing software? (51 lines)
      From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:45:05 -0500
    • Re: Free video editing software? (35 lines)
      From: Ken Wieringo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:07:54 -0500

35. FW: Keeping up with new tools and information
    • FW: Keeping up with new tools and information (64 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:05:02 -0500

36. FW: Premier - SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION ABOUT DETECTION AND DEPLOYMENT OF MICROSOFT'S FEBRUARY SECURITY UPDATES
    • FW: Premier - SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION ABOUT DETECTION AND DEPLOYMENT OF MICROSOFT'S FEBRUARY SECURITY UPDATES (34 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:58:53 -0500

37. FYI: More spam to come? What else is new...
    • FYI: More spam to come? What else is new... (18 lines)
      From: Knobl, Geoffrey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:10:21 -0500
    • Re: FYI: More spam to come? What else is new... (40 lines)
      From: Valdis Kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:39:40 -0500

38. General opinion on Symantc flaw
    • General opinion on Symantc flaw (25 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:32:27 -0500
    • Re: General opinion on Symantc flaw (42 lines)
      From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:09:20 -0500
    • Re: General opinion on Symantc flaw (23 lines)
      From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:21:47 -0500
    • Re: General opinion on Symantc flaw (48 lines)
      From: Fischer, Eric <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:30:41 -0500
    • Re: General opinion on Symantc flaw (34 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:21:49 -0500
    • Re: General opinion on Symantc flaw (18 lines)
      From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:40:46 -0500

39. General opinion on Symantc flaw-UPDATE
    • Re: General opinion on Symantc flaw-UPDATE (56 lines)
      From: Davis, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:08:49 -0500
    • Re: General opinion on Symantc flaw-UPDATE (105 lines)
      From: Steve Warrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:57:10 -0500

40. General opinion on Symantec flaw
    • Re: General opinion on Symantec flaw (34 lines)
      From: Clutter, Richard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:50:37 -0500

41. Group Calendar in Entourage
    • Group Calendar in Entourage (282 lines)
      From: Schnitz, Robert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:12:01 -0500

42. Heads up for Patch Tuesday
    • Heads up for Patch Tuesday (72 lines)
      From: Franchi, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:47:49 -0500

43. Help Choosing a Firewall Solution
    • Help Choosing a Firewall Solution (184 lines)
      From: Carter, James <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:02:54 -0500
    • Re: Help Choosing a Firewall Solution (62 lines)
      From: Kobezak, Philip <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:33:39 -0500
    • Re: Help Choosing a Firewall Solution (85 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:58:37 -0500

44. help turning an excel file into an executable file
    • help turning an excel file into an executable file (29 lines)
      From: Geoffrey M. Knobl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:37:51 -0500

45. IDN Spoofing Security Issue
    • IDN Spoofing Security Issue (93 lines)
      From: Bryan Shake <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:46:05 -0500
    • Re: IDN Spoofing Security Issue (32 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:29:38 -0500
    • Re: IDN Spoofing Security Issue (53 lines)
      From: Valdis Kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:29:10 -0500
    • Re: IDN Spoofing Security Issue (22 lines)
      From: Joe Schottman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:42:57 -0500
    • Re: IDN Spoofing Security Issue (20 lines)
      From: Joe Schottman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:00:04 -0500

46. IIS problem
    • IIS problem (41 lines)
      From: Fuller, Les <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:33:14 -0500

47. IP range for INB banner forms
    • IP range for INB banner forms (15 lines)
      From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:06:35 -0500
    • Re: IP range for INB banner forms (26 lines)
      From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:38:23 -0500
    • Re: IP range for INB banner forms (72 lines)
      From: Brian Rectanus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:23:39 -0500
    • Re: IP range for INB banner forms (97 lines)
      From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:44:47 -0500
    • Re: IP range for INB banner forms (81 lines)
      From: Hill, Siegfried <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:06:59 -0500

48. IS VPN down
    • IS VPN down (83 lines)
      From: Whitehurst, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:43:02 -0500
    • Re: IS VPN down (25 lines)
      From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:47:19 -0500

49. Is your APC BE725BB hissing?
    • Is your APC BE725BB hissing? (29 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:26:12 -0500

50. Just got this offered to my xp sp2 system
    • Just got this offered to my xp sp2 system (23 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:23:08 -0500
    • Re: Just got this offered to my xp sp2 system (31 lines)
      From: Willie Shank <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:39:59 -0500
    • Re: Just got this offered to my xp sp2 system (32 lines)
      From: Davis, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:40:57 -0500
    • Re: Just got this offered to my xp sp2 system (40 lines)
      From: Poertner, Stacey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:44:06 -0500

51. LCD "throw distance"
    • LCD "throw distance" (10 lines)
      From: Landreth, Joyce <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:50:33 -0500
    • Re: LCD "throw distance" (39 lines)
      From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:59:55 -0500
    • Re: LCD "throw distance" (13 lines)
      From: Stephen L. Beatty <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:32:10 -0500
    • Re: LCD "throw distance" (190 lines)
      From: Landreth, Joyce <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:46:10 -0500
    • Re: LCD "throw distance" (796 lines)
      From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:07:04 -0500

52. Link for MS discussion yesterday
    • Link for MS discussion yesterday (22 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:03:07 -0500

53. Looking for an ip address
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (20 lines)
      From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:36:45 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (38 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 05:42:04 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (22 lines)
      From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:31:53 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (39 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:11:12 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (31 lines)
      From: Mike Moyer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:00:31 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (22 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:09:06 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (49 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:35:22 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (19 lines)
      From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:52:02 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (28 lines)
      From: jkuhn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:17:39 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (49 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:23:01 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (72 lines)
      From: Bowden, Zeb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:36:28 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (20 lines)
      From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:43:41 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (23 lines)
      From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:47:49 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (25 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:00:04 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (42 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:24:27 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (37 lines)
      From: Sprague, Rob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:16:10 -0500
    • Re: Looking for an ip address (24 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:12:06 -0500

54. Mac OS X 10.3.8 Update
    • Mac OS X 10.3.8 Update (84 lines)
      From: Bryan Shake <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:07:55 -0500

55. Macs , Exchange and Outlook
    • Re: Macs , Exchange and Outlook (61 lines)
      From: Ken Wieringo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:04:28 -0500

56. Microsoft File Server Migration Toolkit
    • Microsoft File Server Migration Toolkit (16 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:29:16 -0500

57. Microsoft Reminds Users Of Auto SP2 Update Deadline
    • Microsoft Reminds Users Of Auto SP2 Update Deadline (16 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:46:29 -0500

58. More whacked HTTP/PHP magic
    • Re: More whacked HTTP/PHP magic (24 lines)
      From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:23:00 -0500

59. MS Changing activation policy
    • MS Changing activation policy (17 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:34:45 -0500
    • Re: MS Changing activation policy (144 lines)
      From: Joseph Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:44:29 -0500
    • Re: MS Changing activation policy (19 lines)
      From: jschottm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:23:26 -0500
    • Re: MS Changing activation policy (24 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:50:42 -0500
    • Re: MS Changing activation policy (37 lines)
      From: Aras Memisyazici <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:34:47 -0500

60. MS guide to leetspeak
    • MS guide to leetspeak (17 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:49:48 -0500

61. MS Rep Hank Farlow to present W2K3 SP1 and R2
    • MS Rep Hank Farlow to present W2K3 SP1 and R2 (26 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:12:59 -0500

62. MS rep to speak on W2K3 SP1 and R2
    • MS rep to speak on W2K3 SP1 and R2 (21 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:23:08 -0500

63. MS taking applications for MBSA 2.0 beta
    • MS taking applications for MBSA 2.0 beta (23 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:48:25 -0500

64. Name Changes in Global Contacts
    • Name Changes in Global Contacts (248 lines)
      From: Buckwalter, James <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:22:42 -0500

65. network problem
    • network problem (25 lines)
      From: Joe Boling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:56:53 -0500
    • Re: network problem (34 lines)
      From: Ray Stell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:06:17 -0500

66. new junkmail scoring?
    • new junkmail scoring? (28 lines)
      From: Richard Godbee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:15:29 -0500

67. New Microsoft security Bulletins - FYI
    • New Microsoft security Bulletins - FYI (14 lines)
      From: Randy Marchany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:37:19 -0500
    • Re: New Microsoft security Bulletins - FYI (23 lines)
      From: Steve Warrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:52:38 -0500
    • Re: New Microsoft security Bulletins - FYI (109 lines)
      From: Joe Schottman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:03:58 -0500
    • Re: New Microsoft security Bulletins - FYI (16 lines)
      From: Joe Schottman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:11:09 -0500
    • Re: New Microsoft security Bulletins - FYI (26 lines)
      From: Cox, Steven <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:20:40 -0500
    • Re: New Microsoft security Bulletins - FYI (36 lines)
      From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:03:52 -0500

68. New Vulnerabilities - some critical
    • New Vulnerabilities - some critical (52 lines)
      From: Randy Marchany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:49:59 -0500

69. norton ghost 9.0
    • norton ghost 9.0 (27 lines)
      From: mpfountz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:35:17 -0500
    • Re: norton ghost 9.0 (37 lines)
      From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:59:37 -0500
    • Re: norton ghost 9.0 (40 lines)
      From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:18:34 -0500

70. Odd problem in Access
    • Odd problem in Access (26 lines)
      From: Knobl, Geoffrey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:05:55 -0500

71. Online snapshots on NAS (aka skipper.cc.vt.edu, storage.vt.edu, MYSTORE) reduced
    • Online snapshots on NAS (aka skipper.cc.vt.edu, storage.vt.edu, MYSTORE) reduced (20 lines)
      From: Baber, Wanda <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 18:31:56 -0500

72. openldap question
    • openldap question (18 lines)
      From: John Korah <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:49:27 -0500
    • Re: openldap question (25 lines)
      From: David Hawes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:42:13 -0500

73. packet driver for nforce ethernet controller?
    • packet driver for nforce ethernet controller? (22 lines)
      From: Ben Pfountz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:57:53 -0500

74. Paranoia: The Best Defense Against E-Mail Attacks
    • Paranoia: The Best Defense Against E-Mail Attacks (16 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:51:15 -0500

75. Penguin domain unavailable Tuesday morning, February 8th
    • Penguin domain unavailable Tuesday morning, February 8th (27 lines)
      From: DBMS-IWA Calendar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:30:10 -0500

76. PKI interoperability document now available
    • PKI interoperability document now available (25 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:18:13 -0500

77. Possible monitor/graphics card-related problems on banner Optiplex GX270s
    • Re: Possible monitor/graphics card-related problems on banner Optiplex GX270s (62 lines)
      From: Furrow, Carolyn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:48:52 -0500

78. Problem with INB
    • Problem with INB (225 lines)
      From: Epperly, Mandy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:21:11 -0500
    • Re: Problem with INB (349 lines)
      From: Epperly, Mandy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:42:00 -0500
    • Re: Problem with INB (109 lines)
      From: Brian Rectanus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:51:32 -0500

79. Production webserver (Firefly) unavailable Thursday morning, February
    • Production webserver (Firefly) unavailable Thursday morning, February (39 lines)
      From: DBMS-IWA Calendar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:57:03 -0500
    • Re: Production webserver (Firefly) unavailable Thursday morning, February (58 lines)
      From: Mandy Epperly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:00:32 -0500

80. Reversal: Next IE update divorced from Windows
    • Reversal: Next IE update divorced from Windows (16 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:27:15 -0500

81. Robin domain unavailable Tuesday morning, February 8th
    • Robin domain unavailable Tuesday morning, February 8th (45 lines)
      From: DBMS-IWA Calendar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:30:04 -0500
    • Re: Robin domain unavailable Tuesday morning, February 8th (60 lines)
      From: Mandy Epperly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:06:34 -0500

82. Root Kit revealer from Sysinternals
    • Root Kit revealer from Sysinternals (26 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:00:38 -0500
    • Re: Root Kit revealer from Sysinternals (40 lines)
      From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:46:12 -0500
    • Re: Root Kit revealer from Sysinternals (66 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:53:53 -0500
    • Re: Root Kit revealer from Sysinternals (57 lines)
      From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:23:15 -0500
    • Re: Root Kit revealer from Sysinternals (43 lines)
      From: Valdis Kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:26:09 -0500
    • Re: Root Kit revealer from Sysinternals (39 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:45:40 -0500
    • Re: Root Kit revealer from Sysinternals (57 lines)
      From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:00:47 -0500

83. Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain
    • Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (116 lines)
      From: Aras Memisyazici <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:04:30 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (69 lines)
      From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:26:07 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (69 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:34:28 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (105 lines)
      From: Edmonds, Douglas <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:45:58 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (81 lines)
      From: Sprague, Rob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:12:48 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (102 lines)
      From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:06:12 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (34 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:07:37 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (25 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:09:48 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (121 lines)
      From: Sprague, Rob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:10:17 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (39 lines)
      From: Valdis Kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:01:35 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (26 lines)
      From: Joe Schottman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:14:36 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (41 lines)
      From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:34:47 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (63 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:44:12 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (39 lines)
      From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:48 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (43 lines)
      From: Valdis Kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:22:04 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (23 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:42:06 -0500
    • Re: Securing Windows 98 SE on a Win 2000 based domain (55 lines)
      From: Aras Memisyazici <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:50:53 -0500

84. Setting up Lasso on OS X
    • Setting up Lasso on OS X (17 lines)
      From: Joseph Landreth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:41:53 -0500

85. SOLVED: Anyone know why I'm gettin this on VT WebOutlook?
    • SOLVED: Anyone know why I'm gettin this on VT WebOutlook? (98 lines)
      From: Aras Memisyazici <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:51:41 -0500

86. Speaking of spam...
    • Speaking of spam... (69 lines)
      From: Ron Jarrell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:07:47 -0500
    • Re: Speaking of spam... (45 lines)
      From: Joe Schottman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:44:08 -0500

87. SQL Navigator rounding error issue
    • Re: SQL Navigator rounding error issue (34 lines)
      From: Kendall, Gary <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:14:20 -0500

88. Statement of Business Conduct Standards Survey
    • Statement of Business Conduct Standards Survey (16 lines)
      From: Joshua R. Knust <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:42:22 -0500
    • Re: Statement of Business Conduct Standards Survey (31 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:51:20 -0500
    • Re: Statement of Business Conduct Standards Survey (20 lines)
      From: Dominik L. Borkowski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:13:18 -0500
    • Re: Statement of Business Conduct Standards Survey (38 lines)
      From: Joshua R. Knust <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:23:45 -0500
    • Re: Statement of Business Conduct Standards Survey (47 lines)
      From: Steve Warrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:30:20 -0500
    • Re: Statement of Business Conduct Standards Survey (41 lines)
      From: Phil Benchoff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:39:34 -0500
    • Re: Statement of Business Conduct Standards Survey (19 lines)
      From: Richard Godbee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:05:15 -0500

89. Symantec AntiVirus 9.0.2 available
    • Symantec AntiVirus 9.0.2 available (77 lines)
      From: Davis, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:41:47 -0500
    • Re: Symantec AntiVirus 9.0.2 available (39 lines)
      From: Travis Heath <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:24:27 -0500
    • Re: Symantec AntiVirus 9.0.2 available (53 lines)
      From: Davis, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:04:22 -0500
    • Re: Symantec AntiVirus 9.0.2 available (24 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:15:36 -0500
    • Re: Symantec AntiVirus 9.0.2 available (46 lines)
      From: Aras Memisyazici <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:20:25 -0500

90. Symantec UPX Overflow Workaround
    • Symantec UPX Overflow Workaround (15 lines)
      From: Bob Lineberry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:53:11 -0500

91. Techsupport--Spring DCSS--hold the date of April 7
    • Techsupport--Spring DCSS--hold the date of April 7 (32 lines)
      From: Susan Brooker-Gross <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:50:52 -0500

92. test message
    • test message (12 lines)
      From: mpfountz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:46:50 -0500

93. Two questions about SPAM
    • Two questions about SPAM (31 lines)
      From: Harry M. Kriz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:30:21 -0500
    • Re: Two questions about SPAM (39 lines)
      From: Steve Warrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:49:29 -0500
    • Re: Two questions about SPAM (30 lines)
      From: Mike Moyer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:39:30 -0500

94. UIU problem with xp key
    • UIU problem with xp key (169 lines)
      From: Craig, Richard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:11:02 -0500

95. University Relations web sites down
    • University Relations web sites down (22 lines)
      From: libinst <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:19:16 -0500
    • Re: University Relations web sites down (30 lines)
      From: Bruce Harper <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:23:20 -0500

96. Upside down VT Logo
    • Upside down VT Logo (89 lines)
      From: Tucker, Tom <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:15:27 -0500
    • Re: Upside down VT Logo (108 lines)
      From: Sprague, Rob <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:18:08 -0500
    • Re: Upside down VT Logo (44 lines)
      From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:18:45 -0500
    • Re: Upside down VT Logo (19 lines)
      From: Dominik L. Borkowski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:20:45 -0500
    • Re: Upside down VT Logo (751 lines)
      From: Pokorski, Dale <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:21:20 -0500
    • Re: Upside down VT Logo (209 lines)
      From: Pokorski, Dale <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:22:23 -0500
    • Re: Upside down VT Logo (26 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:55:59 -0500
    • Re: Upside down VT Logo (49 lines)
      From: Geoffrey M. Knobl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:40:12 -0500
    • Re: Upside down VT Logo (74 lines)
      From: Schnitz, Robert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:14:18 -0500
    • Re: Upside down VT Logo (36 lines)
      From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:18:11 -0500
    • Re: Upside down VT Logo (19 lines)
      From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:19:28 -0500

97. URL fails in IE browser with server not found/DNS error
    • URL fails in IE browser with server not found/DNS error (56 lines)
      From: Brian Rectanus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:57:10 -0500

98. USB flashdrive not displaying in WinXP's Windows Explorer
    • USB flashdrive not displaying in WinXP's Windows Explorer (50 lines)
      From: Harry M. Kriz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:48:04 -0500
    • Re: USB flashdrive not displaying in WinXP's Windows Explorer (19 lines)
      From: Clutter, Richard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:51:05 -0500

99. Using USB 2 enclosure for ghost?
    • Using USB 2 enclosure for ghost? (26 lines)
      From: Ben Pfountz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:17:39 -0500
    • Re: Using USB 2 enclosure for ghost? (43 lines)
      From: Robert Dickert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:51:49 -0500
    • Re: Using USB 2 enclosure for ghost? (64 lines)
      From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:10:33 -0500

100. Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets
     • Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (217 lines)
       From: Davenport, Justin A. <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:51:51 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (85 lines)
       From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 23:18:25 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (158 lines)
       From: Davenport, Justin A. <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:11:47 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (22 lines)
       From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:31:25 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (34 lines)
       From: Phil Benchoff <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:04:42 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (27 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:20:47 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (37 lines)
       From: Ray Stell <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:52:58 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (65 lines)
       From: Valdis Kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:54:27 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (37 lines)
       From: Davenport, Justin A. <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:53:59 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (57 lines)
       From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:09:53 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (29 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:19:34 -0500
     • Re: Virginia Tech: National Capital Region IP Subnets (38 lines)
       From: Paul Lockaby <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:13:02 -0500

101. VT E-mail blacklist?
     • VT E-mail blacklist? (24 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:59:48 -0500
     • Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (36 lines)
       From: Angert, Ron <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:12:22 -0500
     • Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (36 lines)
       From: Worrell, John <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:14:08 -0500
     • Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (50 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:43:22 -0500
     • Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (75 lines)
       From: Davenport, Justin A. <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:00:11 -0500
     • Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (25 lines)
       From: Brad Tilley <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:17:14 -0500
     • Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (36 lines)
       From: Sippel, Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:19:48 -0500
     • Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (86 lines)
       From: Sprague, Rob <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:20:35 -0500

102. VT SANS-EDU, Registration Deadline extended to 3/3/05
     • VT SANS-EDU, Registration Deadline extended to 3/3/05 (19 lines)
       From: Randy Marchany <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:39:15 -0500

103. VTwug cancelled for today
     • VTwug cancelled for today (19 lines)
       From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:01:53 -0500

104. VTwug tomorrow
     • VTwug tomorrow (28 lines)
       From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:44:54 -0500

105. vulnerabilities of the week - FYI
     • vulnerabilities of the week - FYI (115 lines)
       From: Randy Marchany <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:50:35 -0500

106. Washington Post Article on Dorm Room Phone Extinction
     • Washington Post Article on Dorm Room Phone Extinction (27 lines)
       From: Davenport, Justin A. <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:14:57 -0500
     • Re: Washington Post Article on Dorm Room Phone Extinction (36 lines)
       From: Richard Godbee <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:24:22 -0500

107. Webmail secure cert expired
     • Webmail secure cert expired (83 lines)
       From: Bryan Shake <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:59:11 -0500
     • Re: Webmail secure cert expired (32 lines)
       From: Mike Moyer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:50:19 -0500

108. What's cheaper than free tech support?
     • What's cheaper than free tech support? (16 lines)
       From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:04:37 -0500

109. Who is our Symantec contact? highly critical vulnerability
     • Who is our Symantec contact? highly critical vulnerability (201 lines)
       From: Steve Warrick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:46:36 -0500
     • Re: Who is our Symantec contact? highly critical vulnerability (231 lines)
       From: Steve Warrick <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:34:32 -0500
     • Re: Who is our Symantec contact? highly critical vulnerability (45 lines)
       From: James R. Dunson <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:24:30 -0500
     • Re: Who is our Symantec contact? highly critical vulnerability (55 lines)
       From: Davis, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:39:26 -0500
     • Re: Who is our Symantec contact? highly critical vulnerability (68 lines)
       From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:53:49 -0500
     • Re: Who is our Symantec contact? highly critical vulnerability (26 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:48:45 -0500
     • Re: Who is our Symantec contact? highly critical vulnerability (41 lines)
       From: Davis, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:07:51 -0500
     • Re: Who is our Symantec contact? highly critical vulnerability (22 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:22:38 -0500
     • Re: Who is our Symantec contact? highly critical vulnerability (30 lines)
       From: Joe Schottman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 03:01:11 -0500

110. Windows anti-spyware to come free of charge
     • Windows anti-spyware to come free of charge (16 lines)
       From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:27:49 -0500
     • Re: Windows anti-spyware to come free of charge (19 lines)
       From: Richard Godbee <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:32:39 -0500

111. Windows Auto-Logoff Tool
     • Windows Auto-Logoff Tool (53 lines)
       From: Joseph K. Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:02:20 -0500
     • Re: Windows Auto-Logoff Tool (55 lines)
       From: Sedlak, Neil <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:51:54 -0500
     • Re: Windows Auto-Logoff Tool (78 lines)
       From: Joseph K. Goodman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:36:37 -0500
     • Re: Windows Auto-Logoff Tool (33 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:03:24 -0500
     • Re: Windows Auto-Logoff Tool (35 lines)
       From: Dave <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:56:20 -0500

112. Windows defaults.
     • Windows defaults. (31 lines)
       From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:04:39 -0500
     • Re: Windows defaults. (41 lines)
       From: Molnar, Eric <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:13:30 -0500
     • Re: Windows defaults. (60 lines)
       From: Mike Moyer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:09:50 -0500

113. Windows LPR Win2k3 Quirk
     • Windows LPR Win2k3 Quirk (24 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:40:40 -0500
     • Re: Windows LPR Win2k3 Quirk (22 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:02:57 -0500

114. WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not?
     • WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not? (41 lines)
       From: Harry M. Kriz <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:37:59 -0500
     • Re: WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not? (55 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:21:19 -0500
     • Re: WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not? (66 lines)
       From: Lei Liu <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:21:05 -0500

115. WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not? (Question 2 in my note was my error)
     • Re: WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not? (Question 2 in my note was my error) (46 lines)
       From: Harry M. Kriz <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:31:08 -0500
     • Re: WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not? (Question 2 in my note was my error) (60 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:01:53 -0500
     • Re: WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not? (Question 2 in my note was my error) (75 lines)
       From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:17:03 -0500
     • Re: WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not? (Question 2 in my note was my error) (26 lines)
       From: Mike Moyer <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:04:14 -0500
     • Re: WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not? (Question 2 in my note was my error) (28 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:57:46 -0500
     • Re: WinXP says it cannot delete a file. Why not? (Question 2 in my note was my error) (15 lines)
       From: Ric Dean <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:07:57 -0500

116. ZA/Integrity DoS issue
     • ZA/Integrity DoS issue (16 lines)
       From: Marc DeBonis <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:58:57 -0500

117. [Fwd: APPLE-SA-2005-02-22 Security Update 2005-002] - Java escalation of priviledges
     • [Fwd: APPLE-SA-2005-02-22 Security Update 2005-002] - Java escalation of priviledges (72 lines)
       From: Joe Schottman <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:07:20 -0500

118. [Fwd: iDEFENSE Security Advisory 02.28.05: Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Browser Out Of Memory Heap Corruption Design Error]
     • [Fwd: iDEFENSE Security Advisory 02.28.05: Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Browser Out Of Memory Heap Corruption Design Error] (238 lines)
       From: Bryan Shake <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:05:08 -0500

119. [Fwd: SECURITY UPDATE: PuTTY version 0.57 is released]
     • [Fwd: SECURITY UPDATE: PuTTY version 0.57 is released] (55 lines)
       From: Clark Gaylord <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:58:41 -0500

120. [Fwd: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: List Compromised due to Mailman Vulnerability]
     • [Fwd: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: List Compromised due to Mailman Vulnerability] (135 lines)
       From: Bryan Shake <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:46:25 -0500

121. [techsupport] Filtering Mail in Outlook
     • Re: [techsupport] Filtering Mail in Outlook (42 lines)
       From: Dave Martin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:43:14 -0500

122. [techsupport] Re: anti-spam opinions?
     • Re: [techsupport] Re: anti-spam opinions? (24 lines)
       From: Dave Martin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:52:23 -0500
     • Re: [techsupport] Re: anti-spam opinions? (51 lines)
       From: Franchi, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:18:00 -0500

123. [techsupport] Re: VT E-mail blacklist?
     • Re: [techsupport] Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (25 lines)
       From: Dave Martin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:17:38 -0500
     • Re: [techsupport] Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (31 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:44:49 -0500
     • Re: [techsupport] Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (25 lines)
       From: Sprague, Rob <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:18:21 -0500
     • Re: [techsupport] Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (25 lines)
       From: Luke Scharf <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:43:24 -0500

124. [techsupport] Re: [techsupport] Re: anti-spam opinions?
     • Re: [techsupport] Re: [techsupport] Re: anti-spam opinions? (44 lines)
       From: Dave Martin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:52:53 -0500
     • Re: [techsupport] Re: [techsupport] Re: anti-spam opinions? (67 lines)
       From: Franchi, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:05:39 -0500

125. [techsupport] Re: [techsupport] Re: VT E-mail blacklist?
     • Re: [techsupport] Re: [techsupport] Re: VT E-mail blacklist? (33 lines)
       From: Dave Martin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:58:48 -0500

126. [techsupport] Two questions about SPAM
     • Re: [techsupport] Two questions about SPAM (48 lines)
       From: Dave Martin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:45:23 -0500
     • Re: [techsupport] Two questions about SPAM (67 lines)
       From: Yoder, Denton <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:11:53 -0500

127. [techsupport] VT E-mail blacklist?
     • Re: [techsupport] VT E-mail blacklist? (34 lines)
       From: Dave Martin <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:16:48 -0500

128. [UPDATE]Penguin domain unavailable Tuesday morning, February 8th
     • [UPDATE]Penguin domain unavailable Tuesday morning, February 8th (29 lines)
       From: DBMS-IWA Calendar <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:25:03 -0500
     • Re: [UPDATE]Penguin domain unavailable Tuesday morning, February 8th (119 lines)
       From: Mandy Epperly <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:13:28 -0500